Skip to content

All Articles

TSMC and Intel Net Income Comparison 2024Q2

TSMC and Intel Net Income Comparison 2001 Q1 to 2024 Q2 | TSMC (Net Income 8.2 billion) dominates Intel (Net Income – 1.6 billion) in the semiconductor foundry market.

We compared the quarterly net profits of the two leading semiconductor foundries in the world, TSMC and Intel, covering the period from the first quarter of 2001 to the second quarter of 2024. It can be seen that for most of the time before 2020, Intel’s net profit was greater than TSMC’s. However, starting in the second quarter of 2022, TSMC’s net profit surpassed Intel’s, thanks to its technological advantage in semiconductor foundry services. Over the past two years, Intel has even experienced losses in the first two quarters of 2024, while TSMC has consistently maintained profitability every quarter for more than 23 years, which is quite impressive. We also analyzed the significance behind this shift in profitability, including Intel’s decision in 2021 to re-enter the foundry market and the competition and challenges it has faced since then.

Market Share Matters, but Mindshare is Key

Market Share Matters, but Mindshare is Key: Warren Buffett’s Philosophy on Capturing Hearts

The concept of mindshare originates from value investor Warren Buffett. It refers to a company’s ability to gain a long-term competitive advantage by occupying a prominent position in the minds of consumers, investors, and other stakeholders. Compared to market share, which focuses solely on a product’s sales proportion within a category over a certain period, mindshare encompasses a broader range of factors that influence how people perceive and think about a company. These factors include its reputation and word-of-mouth, brand, product or service quality, management team, financial performance, and other intangible elements.

23 Key Takeaways from Poor Charlies Almanack

23 Key Takeaways from Poor Charlie’s Almanack

The book “Poor Charlie’s Almanack” primarily shares the life wisdom and investment philosophy of Charlie Munger, who is the long-term business partner of Warren Buffett, the legendary investor.The content of the book revolves around the following key aspects:1. The Importance of Cross-Disciplinary Learning: Munger emphasizes that to become an excellent investor or decision-maker, one should not be limited to knowledge from a single field but should instead explore various disciplines and build their own “mental models.” These mental models are like tools in a toolbox, helping us to analyze problems more comprehensively and make better judgments.2. The Power of Compounding: Munger places great importance on the power of compounding, which applies not only to investing but also to many aspects of life. He believes that if you can be just a little smarter than others and allow time to work its magic, the results can be significantly different.3. Avoiding Common Thinking Errors: The book lists many common thinking errors, such as the sunk cost fallacy. Munger reminds us to stay vigilant and avoid letting these errors influence our judgments.4. Investment Philosophy: Munger shares his unique investment philosophy, emphasizing the importance of value investing and how to identify good companies that are undervalued.5. Life Wisdom: Beyond investing, Munger also shares his views on life, happiness, morality, and other aspects.In summary, *”Poor Charlie’s Almanack”* is a book filled with wisdom, suitable not only for investors but for anyone who wants to improve their thinking abilities.

Discover the Pros and Cons of Interactive Brokers' Stock Yield Enhancement Program

Discover the Pros and Cons of Interactive Brokers’ Stock Yield Enhancement Program

Interactive Brokers, Nasdaq ticker symbol IBKR, is a global online broker which offers their customers investment and trading services. Today, we would like to share with you the Pros and Cons of Interactive Brokers’ Stock Yield Enhancement Program, which is a way to make extra interest income by lending yours shares to other people who want to short sell the stocks.

Master the Art of Negotiation

How to Master the Art of Negotiation: Learn these 4 Core Strategies from Harvard University

Today we share key ideas from “Getting to Yes” by Ury and Fisher, focusing on achieving mutually beneficial negotiation outcomes.

Negotiation isn’t about winning or compromising; it’s about understanding and addressing underlying interests.

There are four strategies:

Focus on Interests, Not Positions: Instead of arguing over what you want (positions), delve into why you want it (interests). This fosters empathy and opens doors to creative solutions.

Use Fair Standards: Rely on objective criteria like market rates or regulations to make decisions. This removes personal bias and creates a level playing field.

Invent Options for Mutual Gain: Brainstorm solutions that benefit everyone. Differences can be the source of creativity, leading to win-win scenarios.

Separate the People from the Problem: Maintain a respectful relationship while addressing the issue head-on. Be firm on the problem but understanding towards the person.

Compare Interactive Brokers Fixed Pricing and Tiered Pricing

Compare Interactive Brokers’ Fixed Pricing and Tiered Pricing | the Winner Goes to Tiered Pricing

The conclusion is that Tiered pricing is cheaper compared to Fixed pricing in terms of the commissions you have to pay when buying and selling stocks using the Interactive Brokers platform. In this content, we calculate in detail how much commission you have to pay in different scenarios including how big is your trading amount, buy or sell, whether you buy on the bid or ask. Hopefully, our insights can help as many investors as possible to reduce their investment costs.

Comparison of Gross Profit Margins of Major Car Manufacturers - cover

Comparison of Gross Profit Margins of Major Automobile Manufacturers | Recent Overview of the Automobile and Electric Vehicle Industry

The figure compared the gross profit margins of major international automobile manufacturers over a period spanning from the second quarter of 2022 to the fourth quarter of 2023, totaling seven quarters. In the fourth quarter of 2023, the gross profit margins of each car manufacturer from highest to lowest were Toyota at 22.3%, Honda at 21.7%, Tesla at 17.6%, General Motors at 7.7%, Ford at 5.5%, and the startup Rivian at -46%.

Surprisingly, Rivian had a staggering gross profit margin of negative 193% in the second quarter of 2022, likely due to insufficient production capacity, possibly inadequate yield rates, and insufficient sales. However, fixed costs such as management expenses continued to be incurred, demonstrating the significant challenges faced by capital-intensive startup companies. Since its inception, the company has yet to turn a profit for any quarter. Nonetheless, its electric pickup truck performance and camping experience are remarkable, and there is hope for Rivian to perform well in the future.